The Institute for Systemic Program Improvement through Research in Educational Leadership (INSPIRE Leadership) Collaborative provides a suite of surveys and evaluation resources to support continuous improvement of leadership preparation, professional learning, and practice. The INSPIRE Leadership Suite was designed by and is administered by a team of leadership development experts from the INSPIRE Leadership Collaborative. The INSPIRE Survey suite is administered by the Utah Education Policy Center.
INSPIRE Leadership Collaborative Team
Andrea K. Rorrer, PhD, University of Utah
Michelle D. Young, PhD, Loyola Marymount University
Yongmei Ni, PhD, University of Utah
INSPIRE Faculty Fellow
Jiangang Xia, PhD, University of Nebraska
INSPIRE Support Team
Matt Doane, MPP, University of Utah
Surveys
The INSPIRE Leadership Surveys are available for leadership preparation programs, states, districts, and schools and can be used to provide feedback on program designs, implementation, outcomes, and program improvement. The INSPIRE Leadership Surveys are aligned with national educational leadership standards and even the University Council for Educational Administration (UCEA) Institutional and Program Quality Criteria. COMING SOON: INSPIRE District Program Edition (INSPIRE-D), INSPIRE District Support Edition (INSPIRE-DS)
Preparation Program Edition (INSPIRE-PP)
The INSPIRE Preparation Program (INSPIRE-PP) Survey collects data on essential features of educational leadership programs. It aids in program description, improvement, accreditation, and can contribute to larger databases tracking educational trends. The survey examines candidate selection, program design, core content, instructional methods, assessment practices, and program enhancement, supporting program evaluation and multi-institutional research efforts.
Graduate Edition (INSPIRE-G)
360 Edition (INSPIRE-360)
The INSPIRE 360 Edition enables educational leadership preparation program, districts, and states to understand the leadership practices and school improvement and organizational indicators in the schools where program graduates work from the perspective of teachers and district leader(s) supervisors.